The first words in your e-mail were “Alyce in Wonderland” – explain why. You have questioned my motives all along and where my allegiance lies.  You clearly want it to line up with your own beliefs and agenda.  On much of the issues I am in total agreement with you.  However, I cannot tune out to ideas and concerns that other board members have.  To do so would be irresponsible.

 

With regard to state workers, I told you I don’t let my emotions take over during a meeting.  There is a professional and more effective way to participate in meetings as opposed to going off on people all the time.

 

I don’t know how many times I have to tell you that I support as large a payout as possible.

 

Lastly, with regard to telling me and my mother to have a good life, I have no idea why you are bringing our mother into this.  What axe do you have to grind with her as it pertains to Uganik?  Shall I tell her you are disowning her too?  Get real!  If that’s where you stand you’re going to have to do that on your own.

 

It is abundantly clear to me that you desire a one-time payout of money more than you desire to maintain good relations with your family members.  That’s a choice only you can make and I’ll respect that.

 

Lastly, if you prefer that I step down as board member all you have to do is say the word.  The only reason I am staying on the board is because I didn’t want to let you and Tollak down.  Otherwise, I’d have stepped down long ago.  Just say the word and I’ll send notificatino to other board members immediately.

 

 

 

— On Sat, 9/13/08, Richard E Simeonoff <rsimeonoff@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: Richard E Simeonoff <rsimeonoff@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: sale of land
To: ancroberts@yahoo.com
Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 4:38 PM

what are you talking about? what is your problem? what am I accusing you of? nothing. I am just saying the truth that is all. ACCUSATIONS????!!!! what are you talking about???? respect? you seem to be out in left field. I am just stating facts. I have not accused you of anything. I have tried to call numerous times. what do you want to do? what is your plan? do you have a plan? you told me all you care about is getting the money….. why are you acting this way?. who are you representing? besides yourself? I have the backing of our family. I really donʼt know what to believe from you. if you have a plan lets hear it or if you have an alternate plan or changes to my plan lets hear them. I thought after our last talk we had all this ironed out. why you would get so angry. I do not know. I have not heard one plan from you so what is it say it to the whole board. I am no accusing you of anything. I am trying to ensure the shareholders get the money, period.  please if you have a plan for getting this money to the shareholders of if you have a plan to spend it on something else by all means let it fly. I have not heard any plan from you, period. you told me how you play the other state workers, please donʼt play me anymore, we will be on a professional basis. no more emails, period. you and your mother have a good life

 

From: Alyce Roberts

Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 10:32 PM

To: Richard E Simeonoff

Cc: johntollakC@msn.com

Subject: Re: sale of land

 

That’s it!  I am so fed up with you and your accusations.  Why it is you think that I should think exactly like you and make the same decisions you do 100% of the time is beyond me.  You represent a vote on the board – one that you can make and one that I will not interefere with.  Likewise, I represent a vote on the board and I, not you, will decide how I vote.  You already know I am very much in favor of a large distribution.

 

Until you can treat me with respect, don’t e-mail me unless you are sending an e-mail to all board members.

 

Alyce Roberts

— On Sat, 9/13/08, Richard E Simeonoff <rsimeonoff@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: Richard E Simeonoff <rsimeonoff@hotmail.com>
Subject: sale of land
To: ancroberts@yahoo.com
Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 2:40 AM

Alyce in wonderland. The only big issue I see right now. if we donʼt have the actual percentage of distribution to the shareholders. we will not be locked in at that amount. any board member that has control of the 2 million dollars can hire quite a buffer and have the money used for purposes other than distribution. I would like to have a 95% distribution with maybe more after a budget and operating expenses for the corporation are established. without the wording in the proxy we will have no protection whatsoever.  Dad, Kelly Tollak Gilbert and me favor full distribution of the money but I personally think that 95% will be a fair and just amount. and will not leave the corporation penniless. we need money for Ellen’s car rentals, hotels meals and plane fair. should we vote to pay her six months later? we can distribute the money to verified shareholders and addresses and work on the others later. I asked Ellen for the disputed shareholders and never got a list. I have totally backed off anything but the money.  the proxy is important and we need that wording in there.  Kelly and Gilbert are living in poverty and need this money I have bills Tollak has bills we need to get together on this. I have yet to talk to a shareholder who wants anything more than a minimal board. we have only 31 original members there is no need for all that. I have written this because you donʼt answer my calls. (call screening is great for avoiding undesirables, unless it me)